Today, I went and see “The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe.”:http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0363771/
The story did not resonate much for me, perhaps because too many little details were left out. (I still don’t understand how Alsan came back from the death) But the world of Narnia was represented very well; the landscape and creatures didn’t seem the least bit out of place. They all feel natural, in a fantasy kind of way.
And I like the casts. Young Edmund and Lucy were perfect for their roles. And Jadis, “the white witch,”:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Witch just stole the show. I think she is _cooler_ than “Gandalf.”:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gandalf
Of note, besides the movie, is the theatre itself. Most people I know feels “SF cinema”:http://www.sfcinemacity.com/ is the better choice in Thailand, and I quite agree. The seats are nice and wide, arm rests are retractable, and digital cinematography is really something to behold.
I just love Robin Williams. The man is a genius. I was trying to find a video of him at CES 2006, but stumbled on this gem instead.
เย็นเมื่อวาน ออกจากที่ทำงานประมาณทุ่มนึง ไปกินข้าวมันไก่ประตูน้ำ แล้วไป RCA เลี้ยงเพื่อนที่กำลังจะย้ายไปทำงานที่ใหม่ ไปถึงสามทุ่ม นั่งสามร้าน ถึงบ้านตีสาม ตื่นมาไม่ยักปวดหัว
On the last of the 4-day New Year holiday, I got a bit productive and port K2 to Drupal. This work is based on Drupal 4.7 Beta2 codes and was tested only with that version. K2 is nicer than Kubrick in several ways. It’s pure CSS and doesn’t use any image, its typography more suitable […]
Last night I watched “Hawking”:http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0395571/ on Hallmark Channel. It was released in 2004, but I have never heard of it until now, not surprising for a british film in Bangkok.
People will see this and think of “A Beautiful Mind.”:http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0268978/ Hawking and Nash were both prodigy in their field, but to me that’s where the similarity ends. Nash’s mind was hardly beautiful, and his achievements were driven in a large part by his pursuit of glory. For Hawking, it was the excitement of understanding, and the beauty of structures that inspire.
And the cinematography and scores had done well to portrait this frail man whose inside burns with love of physics and one women. The part I like most is when it finally struck him that singularity and big bang can be the same thing. The young hawking jumped off a train and, on the platform’s ground, drew diagrams showing the idea to his friend Roger Penrose. When he finished writing the results up, he walk out of his Cambridge hall a triumphant man. It’s the feeling of achieving something important that grip me.
Talking about Penrose, he’s one very cool person. (And he still is the last time I caught a glimpse of him in Oxford in 2000.) Other notable physicists in the story are Sir Fred Hoyle and Penzias & Wilson. Thought I like how they tied in the CBR(Cosmic Background Radiation) right from the beginning, unveiling it bit by bit, I’m not sure the general audience will share the same idea. It’s quite confusing if you don’t know why the story always jump to this german guy giving TV interview.
In conclusion, (as a good physicist should always make) it’s a good movie. I recommend it.